Letters to the Editor: July 2, 2010
Printer-friendly version
Send to friendUnequal coverage
While the Office of Consecrated Life is most grateful for the St. Louis Review's continued publication of the annual jubilarian supplement, there is a concern that the jubilarian photos on the cover of the June 25 Review (not the supplement) did not include our consecrated men and women.
A subscription is required to access this content.
Current online and print subscribers, click here to login and view this article.
Please click here to subscribe to the St. Louis Review. You may subscribe to the online edition only or both the online and print editions.
If you already have a subscription and are still unable to access this information, please contact the St. Louis Review.Why does the St. Louis Review require a subscription to access content online? (Click to view).
Bookmark/Search this post with
Related Articles
- Letters to the Editir | July 16, 2010 | Changes in Mass Prayers | Fully Pro-Life?
- Letters to the Editor | July 23, 2010 | Life for civil rights | 'Many' or 'All'
- Letters to the editor May 7, 2010 | Reason sto be thankful | Saint's intercession | Tax exempt?
- Letters to the editor April 23, 2010 | Under assault | Sacrament of the Sick
- Letters to the Editir | Aug. 27, 2010 | Call to obedience | Getting tired
